Man in direct provision appeals Minister’s refusal to let him work

The man who came to Ireland in 2008  has been in direct provision since, awaiting a final determination of his application for refugee status, the three judge Court of Appeal heard.

A man living in direct provision for more than seven years has appealed the Minister for Justice’s refusal to consider his application for permission to take up work here.

A native of Bangladesh, the man arrived in 2008 and has been in direct provision since, awaiting a final determination of his application for refugee status, the three judge Court of Appeal heard.

In a sworn statement, he said he has suffered “almost complete loss of autonomy” within direct provision, was on medication and suffered insomnia and depression.

Work, even on a temporary basis, would “transform my existence”, he said.

He was previously told he would be considered for a position as a chef if available to work and “desperately” wanted to be so.

It is “vital to my development, personal dignity and sense of self-worth to be able to work and be self-supporting”.

Michael Lynn SC, for the man, opened his client’s appeal against the High Court’s rejection of his case against the Minister and State. The appeal centres on an interpretation of provisions of the Refugee and Immigration Acts.

The State argues Section 4 of the Immigration Act prevents the Minister exercising a discretion under Section 9 of the Refugee Act allowing an asylum seeker to work.

Counsel said his client is “trapped” here because, as a result of the Dublin Regulation governing asylum applications, he cannot go to any other EU country to apply for refugee status.

http://www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/courts/man-in-direct-provision-appeals-minister-s-refusal-to-let-him-work-1.2529475

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Man in direct provision appeals Minister’s refusal to let him work

  1. neofenian says:

    What could be taking so long, seven years in the asylum process is just wasting taxpayers money. If he can’t prove he’s entitled to refugee status then deport him.

    Like

  2. kerberos616 says:

    Reblogged this on Kerberos616.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s