Judge finds rights of unborn migrant children may affect deportation

A High Court judge has said the word ‘unborn’ in the Constitution means an ‘unborn child’ with rights beyond the right to life.

He made the findings when granting leave to a Nigerian man, his Irish partner and their now almost one-year-old child – who was born after the case was initiated – for judicial review over the man’s intended deportation.

When considering the application to revoke a 2008 order for the man’s deportation, the Minister for Justice must consider not just the right to life of the unborn but also the legal rights the child will acquire on birth, insofar as those were relevant to deportation, the judge held.

The Minister must consider the constitutional, statutory, EU and European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) rights of the man, his partner and the child, including their family rights under article 8 of the ECHR, he ruled.

He dismissed the State’s arguments the couple have no family rights under the Constitution due to not being married, no rights under article 8 because their situation is “precarious” and the only right their unborn child had was to life.

The State’s submissions were “mired in the middle of the last century” while its citizens “are voting with their feet” and engaging in a much wider variety of family relationships than the State was prepared to acknowledge as having constitutional rights.

He stressed his findings did not mean a person in the position of this man, unlawfully in the State, was automatically entitled to remain here.

The Nigerian man came here in 2007, was refused asylum and subsidiary protection, and a deportation order was made in 2008.

He remained working here, had a short-lived marriage to an EU national and failed to get residency based on marriage to an EU citizen.

He later had a child with a non-EU national before starting a relationship with an Irish woman.

In July 2015 the man and his then pregnant Irish partner sought leave for judicial review and got an interim injunction restraining deportation.

Their child was born in August 2015.

In his decision Mr Justice Humphreys dismissed as “entirely without merit” the Minister’s argument that, when considering the man’s application, the only relevant right of his unborn child was a right to life.

He said the Minister’s undertaking not to deport the man should continue pending a decision on his application for residency based on parentage of an unborn child, with liberty to apply should the Minister seek to withdraw the undertaking.


This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Judge finds rights of unborn migrant children may affect deportation

  1. neofenian says:

    This illegal immigrant Nigerian has been allowed to stay here since 2007, what a farce our system is.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s